Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 8/9] net: add a hardware buffer management helper API
From: Gregory CLEMENT <hidden>
Date: 2016-03-07 08:16:06
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
Hi Marcin, On dim., mars 06 2016, Marcin Wojtas [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Gregory,quoted
+int hwbm_pool_add(struct hwbm_pool *bm_pool, unsigned int buf_num, gfp_t gfp) +{ + int err, i; + unsigned long flags; + + spin_lock_irqsave(&bm_pool->lock, flags); + if (bm_pool->buf_num == bm_pool->size) {'size' field is used as a 'frag_size' but here it means pool capacity. I think it's better to keep 'size' for pool capacity and add 'buf_size' field to struct hwbm_pool.
I thought I already added this field, but it seems that I didn't so. So I will add it.
quoted
+ pr_warn("pool already filled\n"); + return bm_pool->buf_num; + } + + if (buf_num + bm_pool->buf_num > bm_pool->size) { + pr_warn("cannot allocate %d buffers for pool\n", + buf_num); + return 0; + } + + if ((buf_num + bm_pool->buf_num) < bm_pool->buf_num) {What is a point of this condition? How possibly after checking if capacity of pool is not exceeded, this one would ever be true?
see http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2125152/focus=2137421 this test is here to ensure that (buf_num + bm_pool->buf_nu doesn't wrap. Thanks, Gregory -- Gregory Clement, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com