Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 4 authors, 2016-03-15

Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] rds-tcp: Add sysctl tunables for sndbuf/rcvbuf on rds-tcp socket

From: Sowmini Varadhan <hidden>
Date: 2016-03-15 18:16:38

On (03/15/16 11:09), Eric Dumazet wrote:
You said "just as user-space SO_SNDBUF allows ridiculous values
for buffer size.."

So I understood you believe SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF and/or SOCK_MIN_RCVBUF are
ridiculous ;)
No, no! I was saying that as a clueless user-space app, I can SO_SNDBUF
to 1, and happily think that everything is fine (error == 0), when in
reality the kernel has helpfully fixed up the value for me..
I pointed to you the actual code.

sk->sk_sndbuf = max_t(u32, val * 2, SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF);
yes, I'm in the process of changing rds-tcp now (doing sanity tests
etc on it, will send out update in a short while)

No error is returned. kernel enforces a minimal value.

#define SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF         (TCP_SKB_MIN_TRUESIZE * 2)
#define TCP_SKB_MIN_TRUESIZE    (2048 + SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct
sk_buff)))

-> 2 * (2048 + 256) = 4608  given current sk_buff overhead (that might
change in linux 5.4 ... )
Yes, I've seen the comments somewhere (in sock_setsockopt?)

it's a bit unexpectd for someone coming from bsd/solaris because
the value returned by getsockopt is quite unpredictable (as you
point out, depends on the kernel version among other things).
But again if your sysctl allows to set a value below SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF,
that might be a problem, because stack could have a hidden bug for very
small values of sndbuf/rcvbuf. 
sure, fixing/testing it as I write this.

--Sowmini
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help