RE: [PATCH v2 4/4] ethtool: support setting default Rx flow indirection table
From: "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Date: 2016-03-14 18:13:34
-----Original Message----- From: Ben Hutchings [mailto:ben@decadent.org.uk] Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2016 9:25 AM To: Keller, Jacob E <jacob.e.keller@intel.com> Cc: netdev <redacted> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] ethtool: support setting default Rx flow indirection table On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 21:22 +0000, Keller, Jacob E wrote:quoted
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com> --- Not sure if there is a mailing list for this, I sent this to the netdev list but forgot to Cc you on the ethtool change.I haven't been keeping up with netdev for a long time, but I have recently set up filtering by subject so I can keep up with just the ethtool-related messages. Still, patches for the ethtool command should always be explicitly sent to me.quoted
Dave applied the network core patches, but they're more or less useless unless we actually have the ability to request default setting using ethtool (which I extended to support "default" here)The patch was mangled (word-wrapped and modified white-space) in this message, so I took the version in <http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/398404/>. [...]quoted
@@ -3332,7 +3335,7 @@ static int do_srxfh(struct cmd_context *ctx)u32 entry_size = sizeof(rss_head.rss_config[0]); u32 num_weights = 0; - if (ctx->argc < 2) + if (ctx->argc < 1) exit_bad_args();[...] This means we might continue without having the required parameter after "equal", "weight" or "hkey". But, having said that, since we're only checking once before running the loop, we're already failing to validate that properly. I've applied this, but could you please send another patch that adds checks on ctx->argc within the loop and test cases in test-cmdline.c? Ben.
Yes. Not sure how the patch got broken for you here, as I sent it using git-send-email. I will send the proposed fix above. Thanks, Jake