On 10 Mar 2016, at 01:20, Yuchung Cheng [off-list ref] wrote:

PS. I don't understand how (old) RDB can masquerade the losses by
skipping DUPACKs. Perhaps an example helps. Suppose we send 4 packets
and the last 3 were (s)acked. We perform RDB to send a packet that has
previous 4 payloads + 1 new byte. The sender still gets the loss
information?

If I’ve understood you correctly, you’re talking about sending 4 
packets and the first one is lost?

In this case, RDB will not only bundle on the last/new packet but also 
as it sends packet 2 (which will contain 1+2), packet 3 (1+2+3) 
and packet 4 (1+2+3+4). 

So the fact that packet 1 was lost is masqueraded when it is 
recovered by packet 2 and there won’t be any gap in the SACK window
indicating that packet 1 was lost.

Best regards,
Jonas Markussen