Thread (16 messages) flat view 16 messages, 3 authors, 2016-02-25

Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] perf: generalize perf_callchain

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2016-02-25 16:49:06
Also in: lkml

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 08:37:34AM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On 2/25/16 6:18 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
quoted
quoted
 arch/x86/include/asm/stacktrace.h |  2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c  |  4 ++--
 arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c       |  6 ++++--
 arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c      | 18 +++++++++++-------
 arch/x86/oprofile/backtrace.c     |  3 ++-
 include/linux/perf_event.h        | 13 +++++++++++--
 kernel/events/callchain.c         | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
 kernel/events/internal.h          |  2 --
 8 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
And at the very least this should have had a note that it doesn't break
all the other archs that implement perf-callchain stuff.
the cross-arch interface is two weak functions
perf_callchain_kernel() and perf_callchain_user()
and back into generic via perf_callchain_store().
Nothing changes there. The code speaks for itself.
"non-x86 archs are not broken" would be a silly comment.
No, a diffstat like that immediately makes me wonder if you've even
bothered looking at !x86.

A statement to this effect would've shown you did indeed consider it.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help