Thread (3 messages) flat view 3 messages, 3 authors, 2016-02-11

Re: [PATCH v3] openvswitch: allow management from inside user namespaces

From: David Miller <hidden>
Date: 2016-02-11 14:53:50
Also in: lkml

From: Tycho Andersen <redacted>
Date: Fri,  5 Feb 2016 09:20:52 -0700
Operations with the GENL_ADMIN_PERM flag fail permissions checks because
this flag means we call netlink_capable, which uses the init user ns.

Instead, let's introduce a new flag, GENL_UNS_ADMIN_PERM for operations
which should be allowed inside a user namespace.

The motivation for this is to be able to run openvswitch in unprivileged
containers. I've tested this and it seems to work, but I really have no
idea about the security consequences of this patch, so thoughts would be
much appreciated.

v2: use the GENL_UNS_ADMIN_PERM flag instead of a check in each function
v3: use separate ifs for UNS_ADMIN_PERM and ADMIN_PERM, instead of one
    massive one

Reported-by: James Page <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen <redacted>
Applied, thanks.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help