On Wed, 2016-01-20 at 14:49 +0800, Yankejian (Hackim Yim) wrote:
quoted
quoted
+
quoted
quoted
quoted
+ snprintf(ae_dev->name, AE_NAME_SIZE, "%s%d",
DSAF_DEVICE_NAME,
+ (int)atomic_inc_return(&id));
If you bind/unbind device enough times you may get an overflow and
end
up with name of existing device (if you have 1+ of them in the
system).
To avoid such situation better to use IDA/IDR framework.
Hi, Andy
Thanks again for your suggestion.
It seems that using IDA/IDR framework is better, but all of the
functions must be serialized by lock.
AFAIR it's designed in a way you don't need to do any additional
locking or synchronization.
--
Andy Shevchenko [off-list ref]
Intel Finland Oy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html