Re: [PATCH 5/9] bpf: syscall: add percpu version of lookup/update elem
From: Alexei Starovoitov <hidden>
Date: 2016-01-14 01:20:00
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 10:56:38PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Alexei Starovoitov [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:17:23AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:quoted
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Martin KaFai Lau [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 08:38:18AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:quoted
quoted
The userspace usually only aggregates value across all cpu every X seconds.That is just in your case, and Alexei worried the issue of data stale.I believe we are talking about validity of a value. How to make use of a less-stale but invalid data?About the 'invalidity' thing, it should be same between using smp_call(run in IPI irq handler) and simple memcpy(). When smp_call_function_single() is used to request to lookup element in the specific CPU, the value of the element may be in updating in that CPU and not completed yet in eBPF prog, then IPI comes and half updated data is still returned to syscall.hmm. I'm not following. bpf programs are executing with preempt disabled, so smp_call_function_single suppose to execute when bpf is not running.Preempt disabled doesn't mean irq disabled, does it? So when bpf prog is running, the IPI irq for smp_call still may come on that CPU.
In case of kprobes irqs are disabled, but yeah for sockets smp_call won't help. Can probably use schedule_work_on(), but that's too heavy. I guess we need bpf_map_lookup_and_delete_elem() syscall command, so we can delete single pointer out of per-cpu hash map and in call_rcu() copy precise counters.
Also in current non-percpu hash, the situation exists too between lookup elem syscall and updating value of element from bpf prog in SMP.
looks like regular bpf_map_lookup_elem() syscall will return inaccurate data even for per-cpu hash. hmm. we need to brain storm more on it.