Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] net: Move GSO csum into SKB_GSO_CB
From: Edward Cree <hidden>
Date: 2016-01-14 11:10:48
On 14/01/16 05:12, Alexander Duyck wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
This patch moves the checksum maintained by GSO out of skb->csum and into the GSO context block in order to allow for us to work on outer checksums while maintaining the inner checksum offsets in the case of the inner checksum being offloaded, while the outer checksums will be computed. While updating the code I also did a minor cleanu-up on gso_make_checksum. The change is mostly to make it so that we store the values and compute the checksum instead of computing the checksum and then storing the values we needed to update. Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <redacted> --- include/linux/skbuff.h | 14 +++++++------- net/core/skbuff.c | 16 +++++++++------- 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h index 6b6bd42d6134..0150abb81929 100644 --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h@@ -3532,6 +3532,7 @@ static inline struct sec_path *skb_sec_path(struct sk_buff *skb) struct skb_gso_cb { int mac_offset; int encap_level; + __wsum csum; __u16 csum_start; }; #define SKB_GSO_CB(skb) ((struct skb_gso_cb *)(skb)->cb)@@ -3567,15 +3568,14 @@ static inline int gso_pskb_expand_head(struct sk_buff *skb, int extra) */ static inline __sum16 gso_make_checksum(struct sk_buff *skb, __wsum res) { - int plen = SKB_GSO_CB(skb)->csum_start - skb_headroom(skb) - - skb_transport_offset(skb); - __wsum partial; + unsigned char *csum_start = skb_transport_header(skb); + int plen = (skb->head + SKB_GSO_CB(skb)->csum_start) - csum_start; + __wsum partial = SKB_GSO_CB(skb)->csum; - partial = csum_partial(skb_transport_header(skb), plen, skb->csum); - skb->csum = res; - SKB_GSO_CB(skb)->csum_start -= plen; + SKB_GSO_CB(skb)->csum = res; + SKB_GSO_CB(skb)->csum_start = csum_start - skb->head; - return csum_fold(partial); + return csum_fold(csum_partial(csum_start, plen, partial)); }
Update the comment above this function? Apart from that this looks good.