Re: [PATCH 16/17] netfilter: nft_byteorder: provide 64bit le/be conversion
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Date: 2016-01-08 16:55:42
Also in:
netfilter-devel
David Laight [off-list ref] wrote:
From: Florian Westphalquoted
Sent: 08 January 2016 16:24 To: David Laight David Laight [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: Pablo Neira Ayusoquoted
Sent: 08 January 2016 14:02 From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Needed to convert the (64bit) conntrack counters to BE ordering....quoted
switch (priv->size) { + case 8: { + u64 src64; + + switch (priv->op) { + case NFT_BYTEORDER_NTOH: + for (i = 0; i < priv->len / 8; i++) { + src64 = get_unaligned_be64(&src[i]); + src64 = be64_to_cpu((__force __be64)src64); + put_unaligned_be64(src64, &dst[i]); + } + break; + case NFT_BYTEORDER_HTON: + for (i = 0; i < priv->len / 8; i++) { + src64 = get_unaligned_be64(&src[i]); + src64 = (__force u64)cpu_to_be64(src64); + put_unaligned_be64(src64, &dst[i]); + } + break; + } + break;That is horrid.Yes, sorry for this, however ...quoted
On a little-endian system you are byteswapping the data 3 times. Image the code on a cpu that doesn't support misaligned transfers and doesn't have a byteswap instruction.diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_byteorder.c b/net/netfilter/nft_byteorder.c --- a/net/netfilter/nft_byteorder.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nft_byteorder.c@@ -46,16 +46,16 @@ static void nft_byteorder_eval(const struct nft_expr *expr, switch (priv->op) { case NFT_BYTEORDER_NTOH: for (i = 0; i < priv->len / 8; i++) { - src64 = get_unaligned_be64(&src[i]); + src64 = get_unaligned((u64 *)&src[i]); src64 = be64_to_cpu((__force __be64)src64); - put_unaligned_be64(src64, &dst[i]); + put_unaligned(src64, (u64 *)&dst[i]);Why not just: src64 = get_unaligned_be64(&src[i]); put_unaligned(src64, (u64 *)&dst[i]);
Sure.