Hello, David.

On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 12:17:08PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:

None of the existing subsystems are relevant for configuring an L3
networking domain, and it does not make sense to tie net_cls and net_prio to
an L3 domain.

I don't have an answer for that but cgroup isn't a place to put such
stray configurations either.  Please figure out where the
configuration belongs first.  What you're proposing really isn't a
resource controller.  There's no resource being distributed
hierarchically.  It's just dumping configuration which hasn't found
its proper place into cgroup.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun