Re: [PATCH] unix: properly account for FDs passed over unix sockets
From: One Thousand Gnomes <hidden>
Date: 2015-12-31 10:32:33
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 08:12:53 +0100 Willy Tarreau [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 03:08:53PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:quoted
Willy Tarreau wrote:quoted
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 09:58:42AM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:quoted
The MSG_PEEK code should not be harmful and the patch is good as is. I first understood from the published private thread, that it is possible for a program to exceed the rlimit of fds. But the DoS is only by keeping the fds in flight and not attaching them to any program.Exactly. The real issue is when these FDs become very expensive such as pipes full of data.As you wrote how to abuse this vulnerability which exists in Linux 2.0 and later kernel, I quote a short description from private thread. "an unprivileged user consumes all file descriptors so that other unprivileged user cannot work" and "an unprivileged user consumes all kernel memory so that the OOM killer kills almost all processes before the culprit process is killed (CVE-2013-4312)". Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Mitigates: CVE-2013-4312 (Linux 2.0+)Well I didn't reveal any secret as it was publicly reported first in 2010, it's only that Mark sent us the proof of concept exploit on the security list recently :-)
There were demonstrations of this bug posted for BSD unixes before Linux even existed. It and "run the box out of socket buffers" are older than Linux 8) Alan