Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 5 authors, 2016-01-04

Re: [PATCH] unix: properly account for FDs passed over unix sockets

From: One Thousand Gnomes <hidden>
Date: 2015-12-31 10:32:33
Also in: lkml

On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 08:12:53 +0100
Willy Tarreau [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 03:08:53PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
quoted
Willy Tarreau wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 09:58:42AM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
quoted
The MSG_PEEK code should not be harmful and the patch is good as is. I 
first understood from the published private thread, that it is possible 
for a program to exceed the rlimit of fds. But the DoS is only by 
keeping the fds in flight and not attaching them to any program.
Exactly. The real issue is when these FDs become very expensive such as
pipes full of data.
As you wrote how to abuse this vulnerability which exists in Linux 2.0
and later kernel, I quote a short description from private thread.

  "an unprivileged user consumes all file descriptors so that other
  unprivileged user cannot work" and "an unprivileged user consumes all
  kernel memory so that the OOM killer kills almost all processes before
  the culprit process is killed (CVE-2013-4312)".

Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Mitigates: CVE-2013-4312 (Linux 2.0+)
Well I didn't reveal any secret as it was publicly reported first
in 2010, it's only that Mark sent us the proof of concept exploit
on the security list recently :-)
There were demonstrations of this bug posted for BSD unixes before Linux
even existed. It and "run the box out of socket buffers" are older than
Linux 8)

Alan
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help