Thread (5 messages) flat view 5 messages, 2 authors, 2015-12-29

Re: [PATCH] /drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k remove unnecessary ?: operator

From: Ivan Safonov <hidden>
Date: 2015-12-28 18:36:08
Also in: linux-wireless, lkml

On 12/29/2015 12:56 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
On Mon, 2015-12-28 at 20:48 +0700, Ivan Safonov wrote:
quoted
((thermometer < 0) ? 0 : (thermometer == X)) and (thermometer == X) are equal for X >= 0.
X is not guaranteed to be >= 0 here
X is fixed constant. In this case X is {0, 1, 2}.
quoted
@@ -4097,16 +4097,16 @@ static void ar9003_hw_thermometer_apply(struct ath_hw *ah)
  		REG_RMW_FIELD(ah, AR_PHY_65NM_CH2_RXTX4,
  			      AR_PHY_65NM_CH0_RXTX4_THERM_ON_OVR, therm_on);
  
-	therm_on = (thermometer < 0) ? 0 : (thermometer == 0);
+	therm_on = thermometer == 0;
This code is not equivalent.

Check what happens when thermometer is -1.
therm_on = (thermometer < 0) ? 0 : (thermometer == 0) =>
therm_on = (true) ? 0 : (thermometer == 0) =>

therm_on is 0


therm_on = thermometer == 0 =>

therm_on = false


false is equal to 0


Value of the thermometer variable isanerror code, or athermometercode. 
The thermometercode is never equal to the error code (thermometercode >= 
0, error code <0).
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help