Hi Tejun,
On 11/21/2015 05:14 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:> +static int
cgroup_mt_check_v1(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par)
+{
+ struct xt_cgroup_info_v1 *info = par->matchinfo;
+ struct cgroup *cgrp;
+
+ if ((info->invert_path & ~1) || (info->invert_classid & ~1))
+ return -EINVAL;
The checks below use pr_info() in case the configuration is not valid.
Is this missing here on purpose?
I have tested it slightly and it seems to work (also on an older
kernel). I don't know if that qualifies it for a Tested-by but at least
Acked-by should do the trick:
Tested-by: Daniel Wagner <redacted>
Acked-by: Daniel Wagner <redacted>
cheers,
daniel