RE: [PATCH] tree wide: Use kvfree() than conditional kfree()/vfree()
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Date: 2015-11-09 23:25:44
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-acpi, linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, lkml
ACK for the ACPI changes (and CCing Tony and Boris for the heads-up as they are way more famailiar with the APEI code than I am).
Sure. If kvfree() really is smart enough to figure it out then there
it no point in the if (blah) kfree() else vfree().
The drivers/acpi/apei/erst.c code isn't doing anything subtle or magic here.
-Tony
�{.n�+���zwZ��,j���n�˛���m�b��f�)���w+h����&�K�rJ+�Z+��ފw�r��L2Ǟ��i��0�X�����?��zf���ky���[hv�������zf��K�rJ+��