Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] net: dsa: Use delayed work instead of timer+work for polling

[PATCH v2 1/6] net: dsa: Use delayed work instead of timer+work for polling · Neil Armstrong <hidden> · 2015-10-29
Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] net: dsa: Use delayed work instead of timer+work for polling · Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> · 2015-10-29
Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] net: dsa: Use delayed work instead of timer+work for polling · Neil Armstrong <hidden> · 2015-10-29
Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] net: dsa: Use delayed work instead of timer+work for polling · Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> · 2015-10-29
Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] net: dsa: Use delayed work instead of timer+work for polling · Vivien Didelot <hidden> · 2015-10-29
Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] net: dsa: Use delayed work instead of timer+work for polling · Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> · 2015-10-29
Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] net: dsa: Use delayed work instead of timer+work for polling · Neil Armstrong <hidden> · 2015-10-30
Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] net: dsa: Use delayed work instead of timer+work for polling · Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> · 2015-10-30

From: Neil Armstrong <hidden>
Date: 2015-10-30 15:44:23
Also in: lkml

On 10/29/2015 04:28 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:

quoted

Is 6060 supported by the 6352 family? It doesn't share any mv88e6xxx
code...

It is a totally separate driver. Nothing shared at all..  It is an old
device, and only does 10/100. It could be it is just too different to
support via mv88e6xxx.

   Andrew

Andrew,

The link detection still works without the polling for 6060, this will largely simplify the patchset.

I will include a link poll callback removal in my 6060 cleanup patchset.

Then I will include a poll_link removal in dsa.c instead of fixing it.

Neil

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help