Re: [PATCH] ipv6: no addrconf for slave devices

On 10/16/15 10:12 AM, Jan Blunck wrote:

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:02 PM, David Ahern [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On 10/16/15 9:57 AM, Jan Blunck wrote:

quoted

I don't think that enslaved ports should get network layer addresses.
This is one example with a team device:

for VRF devices we do want the enslaved links to have link local addresses.

That is interesting. As far I can see you are setting IFF_SLAVE in
do_vrf_add_slave() and therefore already stop IPv6 addrconf.

Check net-next. That had to be removed to get IPv6 working.