Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: fix hardware bridging
From: Vivien Didelot <hidden>
Date: 2015-10-15 01:37:30
Also in:
lkml
On Oct. Thursday 15 (42) 12:46 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 06:08:34PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:quoted
DSA and its drivers currently hook the NETDEV_CHANGEUPPER net_device event in order to configure the VLAN map of every port. This VLAN map is a feature of these switch chips to hardcode and restrict which output ports a given input port can egress frames to. A Linux bridge is a simple untagged VLAN propagated by the bridge code itself. With a proper 802.1Q support, a driver does not need this hook anymore, and will simply program the related VLAN object. This patchset improves the hardware bridging code in the mv88e6xxx driver with a strict 802.1Q mode.Hi Vivien I just tested this as part of net-next/master, and found a problem.... If i do: ip link set lan0 up ip addr add 192.168.10.2/24 dev lan0 It will not ping. Looking in sys/kernel/debug/dsa0/stats i see broadcast packets, probably ARP, being received at the port. But they are not being forwarded out the CPU port. If however i do brctl addbr br0 brctl addif br0 lan0 ip addr add 192.168.10.2/24 dev br0 ip link set br0 up i can ping. So it looks like we are too restrictive by default. You should be able to use interfaces as they are, without a bridge.
Correct, if the ports are not in a VLAN by default, they cannot talk. If you want to, I think the special VLAN 0 can be used for that purpose. IIRC, in a given configuration, Linux add the interfaces (thus programs the hardware) with VLAN 0. I'm not sure when, maybe when the .ndo_vlan_rx_add_vid is implemented, I need to give it a shot. Otherwise, I can send you a patch configuring the VLAN 0 on switch setup if this is the behavior we want. Thanks, -v