Thread (12 messages) flat view 12 messages, 4 authors, 2015-10-13

Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] net: unix: fix use-after-free

From: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>
Date: 2015-10-12 19:50:32
Also in: lkml

On 10/11/2015 07:55 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>
Date: Fri,  9 Oct 2015 00:15:59 -0400
quoted
These patches are against mainline, I can re-base to net-next, please
let me know.

They have been tested against: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/13/195,
which causes the use-after-free quite quickly and here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/2/693.
Hi,
I'd like to understand how patches that don't even compile can be
"tested"?

net/unix/af_unix.c: In function ‘unix_dgram_writable’:
net/unix/af_unix.c:2480:3: error: ‘other_full’ undeclared (first use in this function)
net/unix/af_unix.c:2480:3: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in

Could you explain how that works, I'm having a hard time understanding
this?
Traveling this week, so responses a bit delayed.

Yes, I screwed up the posting. I had some outstanding code in my
local tree to make it compile, but I failed to refresh my patch series
with this outstanding code before mailing it out. So what I tested/built
was not quite what I mailed out.

As soon as I noticed this issue in patch 3/3 I re-posted it here:

http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=144440355808472&w=2

in an attempt to avoid this confusion. I'm happy to re-post the series
or whatever makes things easiest for you.
Also please address Hannes's feedback, thanks.
I've replied directly to Hannes.

Thanks,

-Jason
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help