Re: [PATCH net-next 4/6] net: dsa: add port_fdb_prepare

quoted

Hi Vivien

Bike shedding a bit, but i would call this
mv88e6xxx_port_fdb_prepare_add.

I think port_fdb_prepare is fine because it is the only step that
actually needs the 2-phase model. del and dump are safe and don't need
pre-check.

O.K. I don't have a strong opinion, i just think sometime later we
might run into a naming consistency issue. If this does happen, we can
fix it then.

    Andrew