On 10/01/2015 06:32 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:

On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 05:27:32PM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote:

quoted

On 09/30/2015 10:21 AM, Neil Armstrong wrote:

quoted

If no switch were found in dsa_setup_dst, return -ENODEV and
exit the dsa_probe cleanly.

...
 

quoted

Couldn't we use the probe defer mechanism here ? (until complete rework is done)

Hi Neil

I was thinking the same last night. We know the switch should be
there, otherwise it would not be in DT. So returning -EPROBE_DEFER
would be valid.

      Andrew

Hi,

It makes sens but does a module insertion triggers the differed probe ?

I will still post this change in a next set of patch.

Neil