Thread (11 messages) flat view 11 messages, 5 authors, 2015-10-28

Re: [PATCH net-next] sock: don't enable netstamp for af_unix sockets

From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hidden>
Date: 2015-10-27 11:15:16


On Tue, Oct 27, 2015, at 12:09, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
Hi Richard,

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015, at 11:11, Richard Cochran wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 02:32:59PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015, at 14:19, Richard Cochran wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 01:51:37PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
quoted
netstamp_needed is toggled for all socket families if they request
timestamping. But some protocols don't need the lower-layer timestamping
code at all. This patch starts disabling it for af-unix.
What problem is this patch trying to solve?
netstamp_needed is a static-key which enables timestamping code in the
networking stack receive functions for every packet, while it is not
needed for AF_UNIX/LOCAL. So it is merely a small performance
enhancement.
Are there any numbers that show the effect of this enhancement?
I haven't personally done any performance numbers.

Jesper (in Cc) noticed that it showed up in perf performance reports
even though he used a very minimal setup. Turned out that
systemd-journald enables timestamping on AF_UNIX sockets which thus
enabled netstamps globally. I think Jesper can chime in here.
Also counter question: why is the netstamp code protected by a
static_key otherwise if not for trying to suppress the code path as
often as possible if not used? ;)

Bye,
Hannes
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help