Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: recreate ipv6 link-local addresses when increasing MTU over IPV6_MIN_MTU
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hidden>
Date: 2015-10-26 16:05:02
Hi Alex, On Mon, Oct 26, 2015, at 16:52, Alexander Duyck wrote:
On 10/26/2015 07:36 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:quoted
Take into consideration that the interface might be disabled for IPv6, thus switch event type. Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <redacted> --- net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c index d0c685c..c2dcebe 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c@@ -3149,6 +3149,7 @@ static int addrconf_notify(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event, case NETDEV_UP: case NETDEV_CHANGE: +netdev_change: if (dev->flags & IFF_SLAVE) break;@@ -3244,8 +3245,10 @@ static int addrconf_notify(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event, if (!idev && dev->mtu >= IPV6_MIN_MTU) { idev = ipv6_add_dev(dev); - if (!IS_ERR(idev)) - break; + if (!IS_ERR(idev)) { + event = NETDEV_UP; + goto netdev_change; + } } /*Seems like this code isn't quite correct. You are calling ipv6_add_dev for slave devices, and if I understand things correctly I don't believe that was happening before and may be an unintended side effect.
Hmm, could you quickly help me where I get into this situation? I made sure I enter the NETDEV_UP part before the IFF_SLAVE test and disable_ipv6 test.
You might want to instead just make it so that you only do the jump, and perhaps change the code in the NETDEV_UP/NETDEV_CHANGE section so that you test for NETDEV_CHANGE instead of NETDEV_UP. That should be enough to get the effect you are looking for and I believe there would be no change to behaviour other than adding IPv6 link-local addresses when the MTU is increased. Give me a bit and I can submit an alternative that may actually work out a bit better I think.
If you go the NETDEV_CHANGE route instead of NETDEV_UP, you end up with the IF_READY flag already set from ipv6_add_dev and thus won't do any initialization of the device. Sure, I wait. Bye, Hannes