Re: [Bug 106241] New: shutdown(3)/close(3) behaviour is incorrect for sockets in accept(3)
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: 2015-10-29 00:15:32
Also in:
linux-fsdevel
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: 2015-10-29 00:15:32
Also in:
linux-fsdevel
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 04:08:29PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
quoted
quoted
Except for legacy stuff and stdin/stdout/stderr games, I really doubt lot of applications absolutely rely on the POSIX thing...We obviously can't turn that into default behaviour, though. BTW, what distribution do you have in mind for those random descriptors? Uniform on [0,INT_MAX] is a bad idea for obvious reasons - you'll blow the memory footprint pretty soon...Simply [0 , fdt->max_fds] is working well in most cases.
Umm... So first you dup2() to establish the ->max_fds you want, then do such opens? What used/unused ratio do you expect to deal with? And what kind of locking are you going to use? Keep in mind that e.g. dup2() is dependent on the lack of allocations while it's working, so it's not as simple as "we don't need no stinkin' ->files_lock"...