Re: [PATCHv4 2/5] net: phy: extend fixed driver with fixed_phy_register()
From: Sergei Shtylyov <hidden>
Date: 2015-09-03 19:37:32
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree
On 09/03/2015 10:20 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
quoted
The existing fixed_phy_add() function has several drawbacks that prevents it from being used as is for OF-based declaration of fixed PHYs: * The address of the PHY on the fake bus needs to be passed, while a dynamic allocation is desired. * Since the phy_device instantiation is post-poned until the next mdiobus scan, there is no way to associate the fixed PHY with its OF node, which later prevents of_phy_connect() from finding this fixed PHY from a given OF node. To solve this, this commit introduces fixed_phy_register(), which will allocate an available PHY address, add the PHY using fixed_phy_add() and instantiate the phy_device structure associated with the provided OF node. Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <redacted> Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Acked-by: Grant Likely <redacted> --- drivers/net/phy/fixed.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/phy_fixed.h | 11 +++++++++ 2 files changed, 72 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/fixed.c b/drivers/net/phy/fixed.c index e41546d..d60d875 100644 --- a/drivers/net/phy/fixed.c +++ b/drivers/net/phy/fixed.c[...]quoted
@@ -203,6 +204,66 @@ err_regs:[...]quoted
+int fixed_phy_register(unsigned int irq, + struct fixed_phy_status *status, + struct device_node *np) +{ + struct fixed_mdio_bus *fmb = &platform_fmb; + struct phy_device *phy; + int phy_addr; + int ret; + + /* Get the next available PHY address, up to PHY_MAX_ADDR */ + spin_lock(&phy_fixed_addr_lock); + if (phy_fixed_addr == PHY_MAX_ADDR) { + spin_unlock(&phy_fixed_addr_lock); + return -ENOSPC; + } + phy_addr = phy_fixed_addr++; + spin_unlock(&phy_fixed_addr_lock); + + ret = fixed_phy_add(PHY_POLL, phy_addr, status);Was rummaging in the fixed_phy driver and a bug sprang right at me: 'phy'
Sorry, s/phy/irq/ of course. Just noticed. :-/
should have been passed here, not PHY_POLL. Luckily, all callers pass PHY_POLL anyway...
[...]
MBR, Sergei