Thread (53 messages) 53 messages, 6 authors, 2015-09-26

Re: netlink: Add netlink_bound helper and use it in netlink_getname

flat view

From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: 2015-09-26 18:09:10
Also in: lkml

Hello, Herbert.

On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 09:16:21PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
You misunderstood what I wrote.  I was not basing this on whether
user-space transitions contained a barrier, but on the fact that
the next syscall must recheck nlk->bound before using nlk->portid.
But that isn't what you wrote in the comment.

	/* No need for barriers here as we return to user-space without
	 * using any of the bound attributes.
	 */
In fact thanks to your email I now realise that my fix to the
getsockname problem is wrong.  Instead of adding a barrier to
netlink_connect I should be adding a nlk->bound check to getname.
I don't know, man.  This thread almost feels surreal at this point.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -1628,7 +1632,7 @@ static int netlink_getname(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr,
 		nladdr->nl_pid = nlk->dst_portid;
 		nladdr->nl_groups = netlink_group_mask(nlk->dst_group);
 	} else {
-		nladdr->nl_pid = nlk->portid;
+		nladdr->nl_pid = netlink_bound(nlk) ? nlk->portid : 0;
 		nladdr->nl_groups = nlk->groups ? nlk->groups[0] : 0;
 	}
 	return 0;
So, this is really weird because netlink_getname() doens't participate
in the autobind race and thus it's perfectly fine for it to not worry
about whether ->bound is set or the memory barrier - whoever its
caller may be, the caller is of course responsible for ensuring that
the port is bound and visible if it expects to read back the number -
ie. if the caller doesn't know (in memory ordering sense) that
bind/connect/sendmsg succeeded, it of course can't expect to reliably
read back the port number.  getname never needed the barrier.  The
above is shifting synchronization from the source to its users.  This
is a bad thing to do.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help