Thread (28 messages) flat view 28 messages, 6 authors, 2015-09-05

Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] Add correlated clocksource deriving system time from an auxiliary clocksource

From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Date: 2015-09-04 15:32:12
Also in: intel-wired-lan, lkml

On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 03:02:19PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
No. This function is explicitely for the precise timestamp usecase,
which is required by PTP and other sane use cases.
Right.  The audio department only needs to know the (ART, ptp) offset.
The kernel and user space never need the (ART, mediaclock) offset.
That is private information for the DSP.

As long as user space reads (ART, ptp) and provides this regulary to
the audio DSP, then the DSP will have all the information it needs to
figure out (ptp, mediaclock).

Thanks,
Richard
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help