On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 06:49:39AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c | 295 ++++++++++++++----------------------
include/linux/usb/gadget_configfs.h | 19 +--
2 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 196 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c
index 294eb74..163d305 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c
@@ -64,6 +64,11 @@ struct gadget_info {
char qw_sign[OS_STRING_QW_SIGN_LEN];
};
+static inline struct gadget_info *to_gadget_info(struct config_item *item)
+{
+ return container_of(to_config_group(item), struct gadget_info, group);
+}
this (and the other helper below) could be macros just fine. Are you 100% compiler
will *always* inline these helpers. The likelyhood of not inlining is minimal, sure,
but what do we get for writing these as functions instead of macros ?
also, lacking commit log
--
balbi