Re: [PATCH RFC V3 2/2] net: Optimize snmp stat aggregation by walking all the percpu data at once
From: Raghavendra K T <hidden>
Date: 2015-08-29 17:24:40
Also in:
lkml
From: Raghavendra K T <hidden>
Date: 2015-08-29 17:24:40
Also in:
lkml
On 08/29/2015 08:51 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
On Sat, 2015-08-29 at 07:32 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:quoted
On Sat, 2015-08-29 at 14:37 +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:quoted
static inline void __snmp6_fill_stats64(u64 *stats, void __percpu *mib, - int items, int bytes, size_t syncpoff) + int items, int bytes, size_t syncpoff) { - int i; + int i, c; int pad = bytes - sizeof(u64) * items; + u64 buff[items]; +One last comment : using variable length arrays is confusing for the reader, and sparse as well. $ make C=2 net/ipv6/addrconf.o ... CHECK net/ipv6/addrconf.c net/ipv6/addrconf.c:4733:18: warning: Variable length array is used. net/ipv6/addrconf.c:4737:25: error: cannot size expression I suggest you remove 'items' parameter and replace it by IPSTATS_MIB_MAX, as __snmp6_fill_stats64() is called exactly once.If you respin, I suggest: o remove "items" from the __snmp6_fill_stats64 arguments and use IPSTATS_MIB_MAX in the function instead
Yes, as also suggested by Eric.
o add braces around the for_each_possible_cpu loop
for_each_possible_cpu(c) {
for (i = 1; i < items; i++)
buff[i] += snmp_get_cpu_field64(mib, c, i, syncpoff);
}Sure. It makes it more readable. will respin V4 with these changes (+ memset 0 for pad which I realized).