Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 3 authors, 2015-08-29

Re: [PATCH RFC V3 2/2] net: Optimize snmp stat aggregation by walking all the percpu data at once

From: Raghavendra K T <hidden>
Date: 2015-08-29 17:24:40
Also in: lkml

On 08/29/2015 08:51 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
On Sat, 2015-08-29 at 07:32 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
quoted
On Sat, 2015-08-29 at 14:37 +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
quoted
  static inline void __snmp6_fill_stats64(u64 *stats, void __percpu *mib,
-				      int items, int bytes, size_t syncpoff)
+					int items, int bytes, size_t syncpoff)
  {
-	int i;
+	int i, c;
  	int pad = bytes - sizeof(u64) * items;
+	u64 buff[items];
+
One last comment : using variable length arrays is confusing for the
reader, and sparse as well.

$ make C=2 net/ipv6/addrconf.o
...
   CHECK   net/ipv6/addrconf.c
net/ipv6/addrconf.c:4733:18: warning: Variable length array is used.
net/ipv6/addrconf.c:4737:25: error: cannot size expression


I suggest you remove 'items' parameter and replace it by
IPSTATS_MIB_MAX, as __snmp6_fill_stats64() is called exactly once.
If you respin, I suggest:

o remove "items" from the __snmp6_fill_stats64 arguments
   and use IPSTATS_MIB_MAX in the function instead
Yes, as also suggested by Eric.
o add braces around the for_each_possible_cpu loop

	for_each_possible_cpu(c) {
		for (i = 1; i < items; i++)
			buff[i] += snmp_get_cpu_field64(mib, c, i, syncpoff);
	}
Sure. It makes it more readable.
will respin V4 with these changes (+ memset 0 for pad which I realized).
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help