Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 7 authors, 2015-09-13

Re: [PATCH net-next v2] bridge: vlan: allow to suppress local mac install for all vlans

From: roopa <hidden>
Date: 2015-08-27 04:57:39
Also in: bridge

On 8/26/15, 4:33 AM, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
quoted
On Aug 25, 2015, at 11:06 PM, David Miller [off-list ref] wrote:

From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <redacted>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 22:28:16 -0700
quoted
Certainly, that should be done and I will look into it, but the
essence of this patch is a bit different. The problem here is not
the size of the fdb entries, it’s more the number of them - having
96000 entries (even if they were 1 byte ones) is just way too much
especially when the fdb hash size is small and static. We could work
on making it dynamic though, but still these type of local entries
per vlan per port can easily be avoided with this option.
96000 bits can be stored in 12k.  Get where I'm going with this?

Look at the problem sideways.
Oh okay, I misunderstood your previous comment. I’ll look into that.
I just wanted to add the other problems we have had with keeping these 
macs (mostly from userspace POV):
- add/del netlink notification storms
- and large netlink dumps

In addition to in-kernel optimizations, will be nice to have a solution 
that reduces the burden on userspace. That will need a newer netlink 
dump format for fdbs. Considering all the changes needed, Nikolays patch 
seems less intrusive.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help