Hi,

Thanks to my first RFC proposal to cap a netlink message in case of an error, i have
rebased my work on Pablo Neira Ayuso.
After some few trials, it appears to me in_skb->sk is not the correct socket to deal with.

Here comes a reworked and tested version based on Pablo's one.

Also i believe it could be good to make it reach stable as it is somehow a bug fix.

What do you think ?

Best Regards
Christophe

Christophe Ricard (1):
  netlink: add NETLINK_CAP_ACK socket option

 include/uapi/linux/netlink.h |  1 +
 net/netlink/af_netlink.c     | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

-- 
2.1.4