On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 19:06:31 +0200
Nikolay Aleksandrov [off-list ref] wrote:
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <redacted>
Hi,
When IFLA_BRPORT_PROXYARP and PROXYARP_WIFI were introduced they weren't
accounted for in the get_slave_size() callback and didn't get a policy
entry, so fix it now. Sending as two separate patches because the first
one goes further back than the second and thus we get 2 different Fixes
tags.
Cheers,
Nik
Nikolay Aleksandrov (2):
bridge: netlink: account for the IFLA_BRPORT_PROXYARP attribute size
and policy
bridge: netlink: account for the IFLA_BRPORT_PROXYARP_WIFI attribute
size and policy
net/bridge/br_netlink.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>