Thread (25 messages) 25 messages, 4 authors, 2015-08-26

Re: Several races in "usbnet" module (kernel 4.1.x)

flat view

From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
Date: 2015-07-23 09:16:02
Also in: lkml

On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 21:33 +0300, Eugene Shatokhin wrote:
The following part is not necessary, I think. usbnet_bh() does not
touch 
EVENT_NO_RUNTIME_PM bit explicitly and these bit operations are
atomic 
w.r.t. each other.
quoted
+     mpn |= !test_and_clear_bit(EVENT_NO_RUNTIME_PM, &dev->flags);
+     /* in case the bh reset a flag */
Yes, they are atomic w.r.t. each other. And that limitation worries me.

I am considering architectures which do atomic operations with
spinlocks. And this code mixes another operation into it. Can
this happen?

CPU A				CPU B

take lock
read old value
				set value to 0
clear bit
write back changed value
release lock

	Regards
		Oliver
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help