Re: [RFC PATCH] slub: RFC: Improving SLUB performance with 38% on NO-PREEMPT
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hidden>
Date: 2015-06-08 09:24:08
Also in:
linux-mm
On Thu, 04 Jun 2015 19:37:57 -0700 Eric Dumazet [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, 2015-06-04 at 12:31 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:quoted
This patch improves performance of SLUB allocator fastpath with 38% by avoiding the call to this_cpu_cmpxchg_double() for NO-PREEMPT kernels. Reviewers please point out why this change is wrong, as such a large improvement should not be possible ;-)I am not sure if anyone already answered, but the cmpxchg_double() is needed to avoid the ABA problem. This is the whole point using tid _and_ freelist Preemption is not the only thing that could happen here, think of interrupts.
Yes, I sort of already knew this. My real question is if disabling local interrupts is enough to avoid this? And, does local irq disabling also stop preemption? Questions relate to this patch: http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/slub-bulk-alloc-extract-objects-from-the-per-cpu-slab.patch -- Best regards, Jesper Dangaard Brouer MSc.CS, Sr. Network Kernel Developer at Red Hat Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>