Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add debugfs interface for VTU
From: Vivien Didelot <hidden>
Date: 2015-06-26 15:42:47
Also in:
lkml
Hi Andrew, On Jun 26, 2015, at 11:23 AM, Andrew Lunn andrew@lunn.ch wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
+static int _mv88e6xxx_vtu_getnext(struct dsa_switch *ds, u16 vid, + struct mv88e6xxx_vtu_entry *entry) +{ + int ret, i; + + ret = _mv88e6xxx_vtu_wait(ds); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + ret = _mv88e6xxx_reg_write(ds, REG_GLOBAL, GLOBAL_VTU_VID, + vid & GLOBAL_VTU_VID_MASK); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + ret = _mv88e6xxx_vtu_cmd(ds, GLOBAL_VTU_OP_VTU_GET_NEXT); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + ret = _mv88e6xxx_reg_read(ds, REG_GLOBAL, GLOBAL_VTU_VID); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + entry->vid = ret & GLOBAL_VTU_VID_MASK; + entry->valid = !!(ret & GLOBAL_VTU_VID_VALID); + + if (entry->valid) { + /* Ports 0-3, offsets 0, 4, 8, 12 */ + ret = _mv88e6xxx_reg_read(ds, REG_GLOBAL, GLOBAL_VTU_DATA_0_3); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + for (i = 0; i < 4; ++i) + entry->tags[i] = (ret >> (i * 4)) & 3; + + /* Ports 4-6, offsets 0, 4, 8 */ + ret = _mv88e6xxx_reg_read(ds, REG_GLOBAL, GLOBAL_VTU_DATA_4_7); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + for (i = 4; i < 7; ++i) + entry->tags[i] = (ret >> ((i - 4) * 4)) & 3; + + ret = _mv88e6xxx_reg_read(ds, REG_GLOBAL, GLOBAL_VTU_FID); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + entry->fid = ret & GLOBAL_VTU_FID_MASK; + + ret = _mv88e6xxx_reg_read(ds, REG_GLOBAL, GLOBAL_VTU_SID); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + entry->sid = ret & GLOBAL_VTU_SID_MASK;As you point out in the header file, not all switches have FID and VID. A quick look at DSDT suggests for both FID and SID: DEV_88E6097_FAMILY | DEV_88E6165_FAMILY | DEV_88E6351_FAMILY | DEV_88E6352_FAMILY Please limit access to these registers to just these families.OK. Thanks for pointing this out. I think you meant SID instead of VID.Yes, my error.quoted
Would something like the following be correct then? #define GLOBAL_VTU_FID 0x02 /* 6097 6165 6351 6352 */ #define GLOBAL_VTU_SID 0x03 /* 6097 6165 6351 6352 */Yes. I've not annotated all #defines, but here there is a clear overlap with the MAC address for some chips, so the comment is justified.quoted
if (mv88e6xxx_6097_family(ds) || mv88e6xxx_6165_family(ds) || mv88e6xxx_6351_family(ds) || mv88e6xxx_6352_family(ds)) { ret = _mv88e6xxx_reg_read(ds, REG_GLOBAL, GLOBAL_VTU_FID); if (ret < 0) return ret; entry->fid = ret & GLOBAL_VTU_FID_MASK; ret = _mv88e6xxx_reg_read(ds, REG_GLOBAL, GLOBAL_VTU_SID); if (ret < 0) return ret; entry->sid = ret & GLOBAL_VTU_SID_MASK; }Maybe add an else to set sid and fid to 0?
Sure, done. Thanks for the reviews. -v