On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Richard Guy Briggs [off-list ref] wrote:
On 15/05/14, Paul Moore wrote:
quoted
* Look at our existing audit records to determine which records should have
namespace and container ID tokens added. We may only want to add the
additional fields in the case where the namespace/container ID tokens are not
the init namespace.
If we have a record that ties a set of namespace IDs with a container
ID, then I expect we only need to list the containerID along with auid
and sessionID.
The problem here is that the kernel has no concept of a "container", and I
don't think it makes any sense to add one just for audit. "Container" is a
marketing term used by some userspace tools.
I can imagine that both audit could benefit from a concept of a
namespace *path* that understands nesting (e.g. root/2/5/1 or
something along those lines). Mapping these to "containers" belongs
in userspace, I think.
--Andy