Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] net: Adding support for Cavium ThunderX network controller

From: David Daney <redacted>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 14:52:30 -0700

As I see it there are two options:

1) Keep the writeq_relaxed()/readq_relaxed(), but add a comment about
why they are safe.

2) Change the patch so that we are using writeq()/readq() and suffer a
decrease in performance.

I want a detailed comment added, so #1 would be my choice.

There are more than one set of register accessors, so make sure you
annotate them all.

Thanks.