On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 01:46:36PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
quoted
Remember, this isn't RDMA namespaces, this is netdev namespace support
for RDMA-CM -> very different things.
That was the point of my email. This is a very myopic view of the
feature. It *should* at least have an idea of these other things too.
Everything you talked about seems covered: iwarp/roce/ib now have a
fairly clear uniform story for CM. usNIC doesn't use core code.
I doubt a larger discussion about a 'rdma namespace' is going to
substantially change these patches, they are really netdev focused.
Anyhow, I've been saving that discussion for when the roce and
umad/uverbs namespace stuff is re-sent. It seems more appropriate at
that point.
I don't know about you, but I am exhausted looking at these huge patch
sets, and narrowing the focus is the only way I see to get through.
This series has hopefully narrowed to: 'fix the flow in netdev
handling for rdma-cm'.
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html