Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2015-05-19

RE: [PATCH v3 for-next 05/13] IB/cm: Reference count ib_cm_ids

From: Hefty, Sean <hidden>
Date: 2015-05-19 22:52:59
Also in: linux-rdma

I find Haggai's argument compelling, it is a very small amount of code
and data to add a sharing count, and a very large amount to duplicate
the whole service id map into cma.c.
I get wanting to share the listen list, but we end up with this:
drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c                       | 129 +++++-
that's more code than what the ib_cm module uses to track listens, and the result is a solution that ends up being split in a weird fashion between the ib_cm, iw_cm (TBD), and rdma_cm.

I wonder if the existing ib_cm interface is even what we want.  Currently, the rdma_cm pushes the private data (i.e. IP address) comparison into the ib_cm.  This is only used by the rdma_cm.  Should that instead be moved out of the ib_cm and handled in the rdma_cm?  And then update the ib_cm to support multiple listens on the same service id.

For example, the ib_cm could simply queue all listen requests on the same service id.  When a REQ arrives, it just calls each listener back until one 'claims' the REQ.  The destruction of a listener could then be synced with the callback.  From what I can tell, the current proposal requires that the ib_cm user be prepared to receive a REQ callback for a listen that it has already destroyed.  If needed, a flag can be added to the ib_cm_listen to indicate if the service id is shared/exclusive.

- Sean 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help