Thread (37 messages) 37 messages, 3 authors, 2015-05-11

Re: [PATCH net-next v6 14/23] bridge: restore br_setlink back to original

From: Scott Feldman <hidden>
Date: 2015-05-10 23:55:47

On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 9:10 AM, roopa [off-list ref] wrote:
On 5/9/15, 12:00 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
quoted
Sat, May 09, 2015 at 07:40:16PM CEST, sfeldma@gmail.com wrote:
quoted
From: Scott Feldman <redacted>

Restore br_setlink back to original and don't call into SELF port driver.
rtnetlink.c:bridge_setlink() already does a call into port driver for
SELF.

bridge set link cmd defaults to MASTER.  From man page for bridge link
set
cmd:

       self   link setting is configured on specified physical device

       master link setting is configured on the software bridge (default)

The link setting has two values: the device-side value and the software
bridge-side value.  These are independent and settable using the bridge
link set cmd by specifying some combination of [master] | [self].
Futhermore, the device-side and bridge-side settings have their own
initial
value, viewable from bridge -d link show cmd.

Restoring br_setlink back to original makes rocker (the only in-kernel
user
of SELF link settings) work as first implement: two-sided values.

It's true that when both MASTER and SELF are specified from the command,
two netlink notifications are generated, one for each side of the
settings.
The user-space app can distiquish between the two notifications by
observing the MASTER or SELF flag.
This is revert of:

commit 68e331c785b85b78f4155e2ab6f90e976b609dc1
Author: Roopa Prabhu [off-list ref]
Date:   Thu Jan 29 22:40:14 2015 -0800

     bridge: offload bridge port attributes to switch asic if feature flag
set

Noting that because I want to make sure everybody is ok with new
behaviour. I tend to like it more.
I am not ok with it. I have raised this earlier. same argument as the fib
code, app now has to remember to call with both master and self. I do
however feel that this code needs some rework..,.add to hardware first and
then software
just like fib and rollback hardware on failure. In which case, i am ok with
submitting a new patch to do it differently.
The problem with your patch to br_setlink/br_dellink is it hard-coded
a default in the kernel bridge driver, inconsistent with the default
of the application (iproute2/bridge).  Reverting it keeps the kernel
out of the default decision and lets the application define a default
that suits it.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help