Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 3 authors, 2015-03-19

Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] mdio-mux-gpio: use new gpiod_get_array and gpiod_put_array functions

From: Rojhalat Ibrahim <hidden>
Date: 2015-03-03 09:45:15
Also in: linux-gpio

On Thursday 26 February 2015 18:54:53 Alexandre Courbot wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Rojhalat Ibrahim [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Use the new gpiod_get_array and gpiod_put_array functions for obtaining and
disposing of GPIO descriptors.

Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Rojhalat Ibrahim <redacted>
---
Change log:
  v5: no change
  v4: use shorter names for members of struct gpio_descs
  v3: no change
  v2: use the new interface

 drivers/net/phy/mdio-mux-gpio.c | 60 ++++++++++++-----------------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/mdio-mux-gpio.c b/drivers/net/phy/mdio-mux-gpio.c
index 320eb15..c49ad09 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/mdio-mux-gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/mdio-mux-gpio.c
@@ -12,33 +12,30 @@
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/phy.h>
 #include <linux/mdio-mux.h>
-#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
+#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>

 #define DRV_VERSION "1.1"
 #define DRV_DESCRIPTION "GPIO controlled MDIO bus multiplexer driver"

-#define MDIO_MUX_GPIO_MAX_BITS 8
-
 struct mdio_mux_gpio_state {
-       struct gpio_desc *gpio[MDIO_MUX_GPIO_MAX_BITS];
-       unsigned int num_gpios;
+       struct gpio_descs *gpios;
        void *mux_handle;
 };

 static int mdio_mux_gpio_switch_fn(int current_child, int desired_child,
                                   void *data)
 {
-       int values[MDIO_MUX_GPIO_MAX_BITS];
-       unsigned int n;
        struct mdio_mux_gpio_state *s = data;
+       int values[s->gpios->ndescs];
+       unsigned int n;

        if (current_child == desired_child)
                return 0;

-       for (n = 0; n < s->num_gpios; n++) {
+       for (n = 0; n < s->gpios->ndescs; n++)
                values[n] = (desired_child >> n) & 1;
-       }
-       gpiod_set_array_cansleep(s->num_gpios, s->gpio, values);
+
+       gpiod_set_array_cansleep(s->gpios->ndescs, s->gpios->desc, values);
One suggestion for a possible further improvement: it would be great
if the gpiod_set/get_array() functions would work on a struct
gpio_descs so users don't have to pass both the number of GPIOs and
the array.

I don't know whether it would be desirable to keep alternative
functions that preserve the current form, for users who want to set
multiple GPIOs but cannot use gpiod_get_array(). struct gpiod_descs is
easy to build, so maybe we don't need them?
I thought about that, but didn't want to change the interface in this
patch series.

Furthermore there is this use case (my use case):

I acquire a descriptor array for multiple data outputs and (among others) a
single descriptor for a clock output. Afterwards I want to set the data bits
and simultaneously clear the clock bit (using gpiod_set_array) before setting
only the clock output (using gpiod_set_value).

Therefore I need an array containing the data bits and the clock bit which
is easy to build.

I could also create a struct gpiod_descs but it would be more complicated
since I would have to allocate a new struct before populating it with the
descriptors and also free the allocated memory afterwards. It's not really
a big deal but more complicated than before.

But this might not be a very common use case.

If we can assume that for the common use case the group of descriptors that
can be acquired using gpiod_get_array() is the same group that should be
set using gpiod_set_array(), it might make sense to change the interface.

   Rojhalat
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help