Thread (3 messages) flat view 3 messages, 3 authors, 2015-03-14

Re: [PATCH 2/3 RFC] ath10k: wmi: match wait_for_completion_timeout return type

From: Nicholas Mc Guire <hidden>
Date: 2015-03-14 08:59:43
Also in: linux-wireless, lkml

On Fri, 13 Mar 2015, Michal Kazior wrote:
On 12 March 2015 at 16:49, Nicholas Mc Guire [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Return type of wait_for_completion_timeout is unsigned long not int.
An appropriately named unsigned long is added and the assignments fixed up.
Rather than returning 0 (timeout) or a more or less random remaining time
(completion success) this return 0 or 1 which also resolves the type of the
functions being int.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <redacted>
---

Checking the call-sites of ath10k_wmi_wait_for_unified_ready and
ath10k_wmi_wait_for_service_ready the positive return value (remaining
time in jiffies) is never passed up the call-chain nor used so it is
cleaner to treat this like a boolean success/fail only (actually the two
functions should probably be of type bool - but that does not seem to be
common practice in the ath10k code base)
It'd make sense to have these functions return 0 or -ETIMEDOUT. In
that case both call sites would need to be adjusted to treat "< 0" or
"!x" as an error (instead of the current "<= 0") condition and not set
-ETIMEDOUT themselves.
looking at the call sites in ath10k_core_start more or less 
all other initialization calls will treate 0 as success and
!=0 as failure so this is the cleaner solution. as its all
now

status = call()
if(status)
 	error

patch just posted.

thx!
hofrat
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help