From: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com> Date: 2015-03-06 18:18:07
On my test environment the troughput of a file transfer drops from
4.4Mbps to 116Kbps due the number of repeated warning messages.
Adding printk_ratelimit() solves the issue without removing the
warning message.
Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ static int bgmac_dma_rx_skb_for_slot(struct bgmac *bgmac,slot->skb=skb;slot->dma_addr=dma_addr;-if(slot->dma_addr&0xC0000000)+if((slot->dma_addr&0xC0000000)&&printk_ratelimit())bgmac_warn(bgmac,"DMA address using 0xC0000000 bit(s), it may need translation trick\n");return0;
@@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ static int bgmac_dma_alloc(struct bgmac *bgmac)ring->mmio_base);gotoerr_dma_free;}-if(ring->dma_base&0xC0000000)+if((ring->dma_base&0xC0000000)&&printk_ratelimit())bgmac_warn(bgmac,"DMA address using 0xC0000000 bit(s), it may need translation trick\n");ring->unaligned=bgmac_dma_unaligned(bgmac,ring,
@@ -536,7 +536,7 @@ static int bgmac_dma_alloc(struct bgmac *bgmac)err=-ENOMEM;gotoerr_dma_free;}-if(ring->dma_base&0xC0000000)+if((ring->dma_base&0xC0000000)&&printk_ratelimit())bgmac_warn(bgmac,"DMA address using 0xC0000000 bit(s), it may need translation trick\n");ring->unaligned=bgmac_dma_unaligned(bgmac,ring,
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Date: 2015-03-06 19:51:08
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 19:17 +0100, Peter Senna Tschudin wrote:
On my test environment the troughput of a file transfer drops from
4.4Mbps to 116Kbps due the number of repeated warning messages.
Adding printk_ratelimit() solves the issue without removing the
warning message.
What value is there for this message being emitted more than once?
On 6 March 2015 at 19:17, Peter Senna Tschudin [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk
On my test environment the troughput of a file transfer drops from
4.4Mbps to 116Kbps due the number of repeated warning messages.
Adding printk_ratelimit() solves the issue without removing the
warning message.
Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ static int bgmac_dma_rx_skb_for_slot(struct bgmac *bgmac,slot->skb=skb;slot->dma_addr=dma_addr;-if(slot->dma_addr&0xC0000000)+if((slot->dma_addr&0xC0000000)&&printk_ratelimit())bgmac_warn(bgmac,"DMA address using 0xC0000000 bit(s), it may need translation trick\n");return0;
Nack. Please just drop this code.
From what I understand network works for you. I've also checked
Broadcom's open source code, and on SoC we can always safely write
whole low 32b.
From: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com> Date: 2015-03-07 09:39:28
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 12:27 AM, Rafał Miłecki [off-list ref] wrote:
On 6 March 2015 at 19:17, Peter Senna Tschudin [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On my test environment the troughput of a file transfer drops from
4.4Mbps to 116Kbps due the number of repeated warning messages.
Adding printk_ratelimit() solves the issue without removing the
warning message.
Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ static int bgmac_dma_rx_skb_for_slot(struct bgmac *bgmac,slot->skb=skb;slot->dma_addr=dma_addr;-if(slot->dma_addr&0xC0000000)+if((slot->dma_addr&0xC0000000)&&printk_ratelimit())bgmac_warn(bgmac,"DMA address using 0xC0000000 bit(s), it may need translation trick\n");return0;
Nack. Please just drop this code.
From what I understand network works for you. I've also checked
Broadcom's open source code, and on SoC we can always safely write
whole low 32b.
Yes, it works for me, even after:
-CONFIG_PAGE_OFFSET=0xC0000000
+CONFIG_PAGE_OFFSET=0x40000000
...
+CONFIG_VMSPLIT_1G=y
+# CONFIG_VMSPLIT_3G is not set
The page offset change was made by make menuconfig as a consequence of
CONFIG_VMSPLIT_1G. After the Kconfig changes the throughput is almost
40 times worst, but commenting the warnings fixes the issue. I'll send
V2 removing the messages completely.
--
Peter