On 02/26/15 17:34, David Miller wrote:
From: Imre Palik <redacted>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:19:25 +0100
quoted
If you are looking for peculiarities in my setup then here they are:
I am on 4k pages, and perf is not working :-(
(I am trying to fix those too, but that is far from being a low hanging fruit.)
So my guess would be that the packet pipeline doesn't fit in the cache/tlb
Pure specualtion until you can actually use perf to measure these
things.
And I don't want to apply patches which were designed based upon
pure speculation.
I did performance measurements in the following way:
Removed those pieces of the packet pipeline that I don't necessarily need one-by-one. Then measured their effect on small packet performance.
This was the only part that produced considerable effect.
The pure speculation was about why the effect is more than 15% increase in packet throughput, although the code path avoided contains way less code than 15% of the packet pipeline. It seems, Felix Fietkau profiled similar changes, and found my guess well founded.
Now could anybody explain me what else is wrong with my patch? I run out of ideas what to improve.
Thanks
Imre