Re: [PATCH net 1/2] rhashtable: unconditionally grow when max_shift is not specified
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Date: 2015-02-25 17:09:42
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Date: 2015-02-25 17:09:42
On 02/25/15 at 05:44pm, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
Note, the reason of this exercise is, because the semantics of max_shift == 0 have changed. A resize on inserts _before_ this change was impossible, now it becomes possible, so we have to disallow resizes (only) for the test case module specifically.
OK, I see what you are doing here. I will work on an improved test case with parallel resizes after Herbert's rehashing. Acked-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>