Thread (27 messages) 27 messages, 7 authors, 2015-03-13

Re: [PATCH net 1/2] rhashtable: unconditionally grow when max_shift is not specified

From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Date: 2015-02-25 17:09:42

On 02/25/15 at 05:44pm, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
Note, the reason of this exercise is, because the semantics of
max_shift == 0 have changed. A resize on inserts _before_ this
change was impossible, now it becomes possible, so we have to
disallow resizes (only) for the test case module specifically.
OK, I see what you are doing here. I will work on an improved
test case with parallel resizes after Herbert's rehashing.

Acked-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help