RE: [PATCH net-next 2/9] be2net: replace (1 << x) with BIT(x)
From: Sathya Perla <hidden>
Date: 2015-02-16 12:56:47
-----Original Message----- From: Sergei Shtylyov [mailto:sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com] Hello. On 2/6/2015 4:18 PM, Sathya Perla wrote:quoted
From: Vasundhara Volam <redacted>quoted
BIT(x) is the preffered usage.Preferred.
:-) As this is a harmless spelling mistake only in the changelog, I'll not bother sending a new patch for this!
[...]quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be.hb/drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be.hquoted
index 3b1d59d..9869556 100644--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be.h +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be.h@@ -361,15 +361,15 @@ enum vf_state { ASSIGNED = 1 }; -#define BE_FLAGS_LINK_STATUS_INIT 1 -#define BE_FLAGS_SRIOV_ENABLED (1 << 2) -#define BE_FLAGS_WORKER_SCHEDULED (1 << 3) -#define BE_FLAGS_VLAN_PROMISC (1 << 4) -#define BE_FLAGS_MCAST_PROMISC (1 << 5) -#define BE_FLAGS_NAPI_ENABLED (1 << 9) -#define BE_FLAGS_QNQ_ASYNC_EVT_RCVD (1 << 11) -#define BE_FLAGS_VXLAN_OFFLOADS (1 << 12) -#define BE_FLAGS_SETUP_DONE (1 << 13) +#define BE_FLAGS_LINK_STATUS_INIT BIT(1)Not BIT(0)?
Huh, this was not intentional. I'll remember to use bit-0 the next time we introduce a new bit!
quoted
+#define BE_FLAGS_SRIOV_ENABLED BIT(2) +#define BE_FLAGS_WORKER_SCHEDULED BIT(3) +#define BE_FLAGS_VLAN_PROMISC BIT(4) +#define BE_FLAGS_MCAST_PROMISC BIT(5) +#define BE_FLAGS_NAPI_ENABLED BIT(6) +#define BE_FLAGS_QNQ_ASYNC_EVT_RCVD BIT(7) +#define BE_FLAGS_VXLAN_OFFLOADS BIT(8) +#define BE_FLAGS_SETUP_DONE BIT(9)So, you decided to renumber the bits?
Yes, some holes in the bit map were removed.