Invalid timestamp? causing tight ack loop (hundreds of thousands of packets / sec) · Avery Fay <hidden> · 2015-02-04
Re: Invalid timestamp? causing tight ack loop (hundreds of thousands of packets / sec) · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2015-02-04
Re: Invalid timestamp? causing tight ack loop (hundreds of thousands of packets / sec) · Avery Fay <hidden> · 2015-02-04
Re: Invalid timestamp? causing tight ack loop (hundreds of thousands of packets / sec) · Avery Fay <hidden> · 2015-02-04
Re: Invalid timestamp? causing tight ack loop (hundreds of thousands of packets / sec) · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2015-02-04
Re: Invalid timestamp? causing tight ack loop (hundreds of thousands of packets / sec) · Avery Fay <hidden> · 2015-02-05
Re: Invalid timestamp? causing tight ack loop (hundreds of thousands of packets / sec) · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2015-02-06
Re: Invalid timestamp? causing tight ack loop (hundreds of thousands of packets / sec) · Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com> · 2015-02-06
Re: Invalid timestamp? causing tight ack loop (hundreds of thousands of packets / sec) · Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com> · 2015-02-09

Re: Invalid timestamp? causing tight ack loop (hundreds of thousands of packets / sec)

From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2015-02-06 00:17:54

On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 15:25 -0800, Avery Fay wrote:

Are these available anywhere? Or could they be made available? This
seems like a much better solution than disabling timestamps.

Neal is currently polishing a serie of 4 patches.

This should be land to netdev shortly ;)

Thanks