Re: [PATCH net-next] bridge: Let bridge not age 'externally' learnt FDB entries, they are removed when 'external' entity notifies the aging
flat view
From: Scott Feldman <hidden>
Date: 2015-02-05 17:55:35
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Scott Feldman [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:05 AM, B Viswanath [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 5 February 2015 at 15:56, Siva Mannem [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 1:23 PM, David Miller [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: Scott Feldman <redacted> Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 23:13:07 -0800quoted
I'd like to see this patch reverted so we can have a more comprehensive discussion/solution. With this patch applied, the only user (rocker) of NETDEV_SWITCH_FDB_ADD is broken. So please undo this patch so rocker isn't broken and let's work on a knob to suit both modes: 1) let bridge manage aging, 2) let device manage aging.Patch reverted.
Thank you.
quoted
quoted
I now see why rocker is broken. Sorry for the churn. As Scott/Roopa suggested, a new flag IFLA_BRPORT_AGING_SYNC (similar to IFLA_BRPORT_LEARNING_SYNC) can be defined and stored in net_bridge_port->flags when user configures it. Some thing like below. $ sudo bridge link set dev swp1 ageing_sync on self And bridge ageing logic does not age externally learnt entry *only* if IFLA_BRPORT_AGING_SYNC flag on fdb entry's net_bridge_port is set. This ensures that existing behavior continues to be default behavior and is of no harm to rocker. Please let me know your comments on above approach.I am not sure you really want to pass on this burden of deciding who should age to the end user. I think user should not be forced to be aware of all the device and driver properties. May be a different way would be that - 1. driver specifies whether it can supporting ageing by itself (the chip) during registration. 2. driver also allows that kernel turn off the driver/device ageing. 3. when a bridge is created with all ports from same device which supports ageing (and which is currently enabled), then bridge defers ageing to driver. Otherwise bridge disables ageing on all participating devices and takes care of ageing by itself. 4. When ageing is disabled on a device, all other bridges that use any ports from that device start ageing themselves. I guess this sounds complicated, but it can ensure that user gets the best default behaviour based on the device. Any alternate suggestions ?
So let me see if I can summarize the PROs and CONs of using the default behavior of the bridge driver for ageing externally learned FDB entries: PROs 1) No new user knobs; just use existing bridge ageing settings for both internal and externally learned FDB entries. 2) Because we're using SW bridge, all offloaded switches behave the same w.r.t. ageing. 3) Because we're using SW bridge, bug fixes and enhancements apply to all offloaded switches. 4) Switch device model w.r.t. FDB ageing is simple to understand. 5) User's view of the ageing process is the same for internal and external learned FDB entries. The last-used stats make sense. 6) Leveraging what's already there...bridge ageing function is tried-and-true....let's reuse it if we can. CONs 1) Scale-ability. The bridge driver can't keep up with ageing many (10^5, for example) entries. 2) Scale-ability. Keeping the entries periodically refreshed requires a refresh sync from the device to the bridge driver, and the bridge driver/kernel can't keep up. 3) With the bridge driver, the ageing settings are per-bridge, not per-port. Did I miss any points? I think it boils down to use-ability vs. scale-ability. My personal opinion is I'm skeptical there are real scale-ability issues because the on-board switch CPU should easily be able to handle the ageing tasks. After all, the CPU will for the most part be idle, only worrying about the occasional ctrl pkt (STP, LLDP, OSPF, etc). I'm most interested in keeping the user's experience simple, so if we can extend the existing bridge ageing model to offloaded devices without changing the users' experience compared to the non-offloaded case. So let's draw out the CONs for using the bridge driver's ageing function as-is. -scott