Thread (10 messages) flat view 10 messages, 2 authors, 2015-01-22

Re: [PATCH net-next v13 5/5] openvswitch: Add support for unique flow IDs.

From: Joe Stringer <hidden>
Date: 2015-01-21 19:35:59
Also in: lkml

On 21 January 2015 at 10:31, Pravin Shelar [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Joe Stringer [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Previously, flows were manipulated by userspace specifying a full,
unmasked flow key. This adds significant burden onto flow
serialization/deserialization, particularly when dumping flows.

This patch adds an alternative way to refer to flows using a
variable-length "unique flow identifier" (UFID). At flow setup time,
userspace may specify a UFID for a flow, which is stored with the flow
and inserted into a separate table for lookup, in addition to the
standard flow table. Flows created using a UFID must be fetched or
deleted using the UFID.

All flow dump operations may now be made more terse with OVS_UFID_F_*
flags. For example, the OVS_UFID_F_OMIT_KEY flag allows responses to
omit the flow key from a datapath operation if the flow has a
corresponding UFID. This significantly reduces the time spent assembling
and transacting netlink messages. With all OVS_UFID_F_OMIT_* flags
enabled, the datapath only returns the UFID and statistics for each flow
during flow dump, increasing ovs-vswitchd revalidator performance by 40%
or more.

Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer <redacted>
Its almost ready. But I saw minor issues,
few checkpatch.pl failures.
in ovs_flow_cmd_new() we should use unmasked key to lookup in flow
table for legacy case.
Thanks for review, I can send out a fresh version soon. Should I
resend the whole series or is just a new version of this patch
sufficient?
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help