Re: [PATCH] brcm80211: brcmsmac: dma: Remove some unused functions
From: Rickard Strandqvist <hidden>
Date: 2015-01-04 12:44:04
Also in:
linux-wireless, lkml
2015-01-04 7:21 GMT+01:00 Larry Finger [off-list ref]:
On 01/03/2015 06:47 PM, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:quoted
Removes some functions that are not used anywhere: dma_txflush() dma_txsuspended() This was partially found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck. Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist [off-list ref] --- drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/dma.c | 19 ------------------- drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/dma.h | 2 -- 2 files changed, 21 deletions(-)Just because file dma.c is involved, it does not need to be, nor should it be in the subject line. You could specify the driver names in the file tree after wireless. In this instance, one possible subject would be "brcm80211: brcmsmac: Remove some unused functions". On the other hand, if you look at "git log" to see past patches, the driver maintainers even leave off the brcm80211 part, thus to match them, the subject should be "brcmsmac: Remove some unused functions". As was suggested earlier, you need to look at the precedents. Keeping a uniform method of patch naming helps when looking for patches in the git log. Larry
Hi Larry As I hope you can see I have made some changes regarding the subject-line. Thought it was an advantage to be able to see which file I actually removed something from. There seems to be a big focus on getting right on subject-line right in recent weeks. I wonder why there is a script that takes a file name, and respond with an appropriate subject line? But ok, I change my script accordingly. Should I submit the patch again? Kind regards Rickard Strandqvist -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html